Explaining Prejudicial Attitudes and Bias-Motivated Aggression in Belgium: a Comparison of Individual-Level Theoretical Models

Abstract Prejudice and bias-motivated aggression (BMA) are pervasive social problems. Scholars have tested numerous competing theoretical models to demonstrate the key predicates of prejudice BMA, including intergroup contact, dual process (i.e., right-wing authoritarianism dominance orientation), perceived injustice, peer socialization, empathy. Yet, studies date not empirically examined comparative strength these perspectives explain correlates (a) (b) BMA. This study seeks address this gap. Utilizing a sample young 1,001 Belgian participants, explores association between constructs from different better understand BMA towards immigrant populations. Findings show that when accounting for all strongest predictors emerge dual-process model, empathy model (outgroup empathy), quality (not frequency) contact. exposure outgroup hostility We discuss implications our findings suggest drawing on criminological theories can be integrated provide more nuanced understanding nature than what is currently known. conclude by highlighting some directions future research